For those tuning into the
exchange, my response turned into something more than a comment:
Anonymous, I don't mind that you disagree with me or think I'm creepy. As a matter of fact, you probably know me well enough to not need to divine it from the fact that I play D&D. I'm actually far nerdier than I let on. I wear a shirt to work that says "Geek." My wife bought it for me. After all when it is as plain as the crooked nose on my face, why try and hide it. BTW, your ad hominem attacks seem well practiced. Did you perchance pick on the fat kids or the nerds in school? Just sign up for a blogger name so that you don't need to hide behind anonymous.
There were a couple of elements that I've responding to in your post. First, I'd like to call for a closer reading of my original post. It's a weak defense, but it's just a start. Then I would like to talk about extended breastfeeding. Next up for discussion is
La Leche League (LLL) followed by my response to what I read of your critique of my parenting style. Finally I'd like to conclude with a discussion of the phrases mainstream media and social norms.
If you reread my post, you'll notice that I didn't note that he was five until it came time to set up the "punchline." If she had mentioned that the kid was five, I didn't hear it - too busy trying to get stuff done around the house. I might have even been painting figurines but probably not just then. And when the punchline came I was unhappy. They took an opportunity to show breastfeeding a non-infant as a good and healthy thing and flushed it down the toilet. I was unhappy because they did go to extremes. It sets up anyone who breastfeeds their child beyond some mystical cutoff is a "LLL crazy."
I'd like to hear your opinion on when this mystical cutoff for the cessation of breastfeeding is by the way. I'd hate to offend you if you are still a reader when/if we've passed it. Elements that you cite for the cutoff are proficiency with cutlery, the spoken word, and some level of gross motor system. Many of these elements are present as early as six months. Is a year too long? Two? Three? We already know that you think that five is too long. But the
American Academy of Pediatrics, the
American Academy of Family Physicians, and the
World Health Organization disagree with you and agree with me. In total, they say that extended breastfeeding is nutritionally, immunologically, intellectually, and emotionally healthy for the child and to the mother as well. It sounds like a pretty complete package. Definitely a far cry from "retard(ing) the child's development as an independent and social being when it is face down in mommy's boobs."
La Leche League's mission is "To help mothers worldwide to breastfeed through mother-to-mother support, encouragement, information, and education and to promote a better understanding of breastfeeding as an important element in the healthy development of the baby and mother." My own personal experiences with the organization in all of the meetings that I've gone to is that it is a great source of information to aspiring breastfeeders, a good support group for those mothers who choose to breastfeed, and an excellent source of information on parenting styles. I understand that not every group is created equally. I've had friends tell me that they went to a meeting that was rather militant. As I said, that's not been my experience. If you, your friends, or your family has had a bad personal experience with La Leche League, I'm sorry to hear it. Perhaps the group that they went to didn't fit their style. There are others out there from which an aspiring breastfeeder can get support (in St. Louis, Kangaroo Kids is one such place). I'd urge anyone who is considering breastfeeding to get involved in one of these support group. After all they didn't leave the factory with an instruction manual. I've never felt that the group preyed on my "natural parenting style" but rather offered suggestions on how to do it more naturally. Some things we picked up. Others we left behind.
I've written that every parent is sensitive to critiques on their parenting style. We all want what is best for our child and for many that means that parenting becomes some sort of competition. Anonymous, I'm not trying to critique your parenting style. But I do read your post as containing critiques on mine. Let's see "parental overcompensation", the cow comment, "warehouse their kid at daycare", "crazies", "insecure", and "single-minded zealots". I almost don't know where to begin. I'll leave the crazies and insecurity and zealot. I do like how you are making me out to be some sort of breastfeeding terrorist though. Nice work.
Let's start with the cow. I'm glad that you express a certain level of support for the whole idea of breastfeeding. At least we have something in common. I'm glad that you are not grossed out by a flash of breast either. Bravo for you. But where does the cow thing start? From day one? After a year? From the definition of the process it would almost seem like in your words that any amount of breastfeeding is a display of parental overcompensation. After all from day one, the milk that the mother is producing is "even to this day is much better than what my child could get anywhere else." Certainly better than an actual cow, or a goat, or even another mother. And most definitely better than formula. The action of breastfeeding is in actuality a process of "milking" the mother. Mom, cow, I get it. But there we're overcompensating again. Damn it. We'll have to stop. But the thing is that we aren't actually overcompensating. We're doing the thing that all of those organizations that I cited earlier tell us is best for our child. Now let me go back to revisit part of what I didn't say earlier. All of this support is that as long as it is mutually desired by mother and child. But if mom wants it and baby wants it, it's a unquestionably good thing.
That leaves us with warehousing my kids at day care. To a certain extent, I'll agree with you. If it were a practical option for my family I would have quit my job and stayed home with Oliver. It was really only a practical option for me to quit my job since my wife makes a non-trivial amount of money more than I do. We could have rejiggered our finances, put off major home improvements, and made it practical for me to stay home. If I'm being totally honest with you, that would have been a disaster. I see how other people interact with their children. I just keep forgetting to talk to Oliver. One of our favorite games is where I play the Kissing Monster and I chased him around the house. Great fun, but I don't say many words other than "I'm coming to get you." When I drive Oliver to the warehouse, I don't sing and sometimes prefer to have a book on tape or NPR or the oldies station on. While I'm good at cooking and cleaning I'd be a disaster as a SAHD. I'm getting better about being self-motivated, but there is still a certain amount of prodding needed to get me to do anything. So we chose not to do that. And Oliver is not showing any ill effects from it. He's a happy, well-adjusted, confident toddler. Could he have been better at home with me? The world will never know.
All in all, I think we've done a good job. And you missed the chance to take swipes at early potty training, co-sleeping, and delayed introduction of solid food and cow's milk. Still I take some measure of offense at your critiques.
Finally I'd like to discuss the mainstream media and social norms. The mainstream media has little care for social norms. It cares about ratings and will do whatever it takes to get them. I offer as proof "Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Millionaire." On the other hand, the mainstream media is also willing to give you the same thing over and over again until the golden geese is dead and only bones remain. Witness CSI, CSI:Miami, CSI: New York, Law and Order, Law and Order: Criminal Intent, Law and Order: Special Victims Unit. Or it will tell you what you want to hear and not challenge you. Witness the kid gloves treatment of Bush after 9/11. Hell, our elected officials were even willing to let him wage war on a concept. But sometimes, the mainstream media can be effective at changing the level of debate. Witness The Morning After. It isn't too much to hope that someone would take a chance to add something to the debate.
I've never much cared for social norms. I'm a nerd and I always have been. My fraternity had girls in it. I played Magic: The Gathering, Dungeons and Dragons, and computer games. Once held a bag of frozen peas up to my nose after breaking it against a car so that I could play computer games. My last two cars were selected primarily because of fuel economy not performance. And so I shudder when Anonymous holds up social norms as a measuring stick of how well I'm doing. Upholding social norms isn't always a good thing. Racism, anti-Semitism, sexism, homophobia, and smoking were at one time also social norms.I don't think society is better off now that they aren't as prevalent. Minimalist breastfeeding is now a social norm. In the future it may not be. So if the general public isn't comfortable with the idea now, well, fuck 'em if they can't take a joke.